A Context-Aware Neural Retrieval Framework for Fall Detection in IoT-Based Elderly Care

Authors

  • Vanaj Kalyan S. R. Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • Dharshan S. S. Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • R. S. Pavithra Anurag University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Author
  • Puja Sai Akshath Anurag University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Author
  • Nihal Gopisetti Anurag University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68337/cpsm.v1.i2.2026-025

Keywords:

Fall detection, neural information retrieval, learning to rank, IoT sensor analytics, transformer models, intelligent systems

Abstract

Wearable Internet of Things (IoT) devices produce long, continuous streams of inertial data, and the difficult part is picking out the few moments that matter. Most fall detection systems treat each segment of data as a separate yes-or-no decision. That works in a laboratory, but it gives a caregiver no help in deciding which of 50 alerts to check first. We approach fall monitoring as an information retrieval problem instead. Accelerometer and gyroscope signals are split into overlapping windows, each window is encoded with a transformer, and the system learns to rank windows by how likely they are to contain a fall. On top of the ranking we add two context signals, one measuring motion instability and one estimating impact severity, so that the most dangerous events come out on top. On the SisFall dataset the system reaches an average precision (AP) of 0.983 with a normalized discounted cumulative gain at rank 10 (nDCG@10) of 1.0, so real fall events almost always appear at the top of the ranked list, ahead of convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and transformer classification baselines. The result is a monitoring system that gives ranked, interpretable output instead of a stream of binary alarms and that matches how caregivers handle events in practice.

References

[1] Raul Igual, Carlos Medrano, and Inmaculada Plaza, "Challenges, issues and trends in fall detection systems," BioMed. Eng. OnLine, vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 66, 2013, doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-66.

[2] Amir Mosavi, Pinar Ozturk, and Kwok-wing Chau, "Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review," Water, vol. 10, no. 11, Art. no. 1536, 2018, doi: 10.3390/w10111536.

[3] Manuel Méndez, Mercedes G. Merayo, and Manuel Núñez, "Machine learning algorithms to forecast air quality: A survey," Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 10031-10066, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10424-4.

[4] Adrian B. R. Shatte, Delyse M. Hutchinson, and Samantha J. Teague, "Machine learning in mental health: A scoping review of methods and applications," Psychol. Med., vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1426-1448, 2019, doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000151.

[5] Muhammad Mubashir, Ling Shao, and Luke Seed, "A survey on fall detection: Principles and approaches," Neurocomputing, vol. 100, pp. 144-152, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2011.09.037.

[6] Xueyi Wang, Joshua Ellul, and George Azzopardi, "Elderly fall detection systems: A literature survey," Front. Robot. AI, vol. 7, Art. no. 71, 2020, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00071.

[7] A. K. Bourke, J. V. O'Brien, and G. M. Lyons, "Evaluation of a threshold-based tri-axial accelerometer fall detection algorithm," Gait Posture, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 194-199, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.09.012.

[8] Francisco Ordóñez and Daniel Roggen, "Deep convolutional and LSTM recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition," Sensors, vol. 16, no. 1, Art. no. 115, 2016, doi: 10.3390/s16010115.

[9] Tie-Yan Liu, "Learning to rank for information retrieval," Found. Trends Inf. Retr., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 225-331, 2009, doi: 10.1561/1500000016.

[10] Chris Burges, Tal Shaked, Erin Renshaw, Ari Lazier, Matt Deeds, Nicole Hamilton, and Greg Hullender, "Learning to rank using gradient descent," in Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), 2005, pp. 89-96, doi: 10.1145/1102351.1102363.

[11] Kalervo Järvelin and Jaana Kekäläinen, "Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques," ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 422-446, 2002, doi: 10.1145/582415.582418.

[12] Rodrigo Nogueira and Kyunghyun Cho, "Passage re-ranking with BERT," arXiv:1901.04085, 2019, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1901.04085.

[13] Vladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis, Ledell Wu, Sergey Edunov, Danqi Chen, and Wen-tau Yih, "Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering," in Proc. 2020 Conf. Empirical Methods Nat. Lang. Process. (EMNLP), 2020, pp. 6769-6781, doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550.

[14] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin, "Attention is all you need," in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 30, 2017, pp. 5998-6008.

[15] Angela Sucerquia, José David López, and Jesús Francisco Vargas-Bonilla, "SisFall: A fall and movement dataset," Sensors, vol. 17, no. 1, Art. no. 198, 2017, doi: 10.3390/s17010198.

[16] George Vavoulas, Matthew Pediaditis, Emmanouil G. Spanakis, and Manolis Tsiknakis, "The MobiFall dataset: An initial evaluation of fall detection algorithms using smartphones," in Proc. 13th IEEE Int. Conf. Bioinform. Bioeng. (BIBE), 2013, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/BIBE.2013.6701629.

[17] Eduardo Casilari, José A. Santoyo-Ramón, and José M. Cano-García, "UMAFall: A multisensor dataset for the research on automatic fall detection," Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 110, pp. 32-39, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.110.

[18] Praveen Kumar, "When lexical beats neural: A content-aware analysis of duplicate bug report retrieval across software projects," Preprints, 2026, doi: 10.20944/preprints202606.1069.v1.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

Data Availability Statement

This study used the publicly available SisFall dataset [15]. Further data supporting the findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

How to Cite

A Context-Aware Neural Retrieval Framework for Fall Detection in IoT-Based Elderly Care. (2026). Conference Proceedings in Science and Management, 1(2), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.68337/cpsm.v1.i2.2026-025