Navigating the Trust Paradox: AI-Generated Fake Reviews, Influencer Transparency, and Consumer Purchase Intentions in Digital Markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68337/cpsm.v1.i2.2026-041Keywords:
AI-generated fake reviews, influencer transparency, consumer trust, perceived authenticity, purchase intention, brand credibility, social proofAbstract
The marketing industry is increasingly filled with content generated by artificial intelligence (AI), yet the effect of this content on consumer trust remains largely unknown. This study investigated the effects of AI-generated fake reviews, bot engagement, influencer transparency, and perceived authenticity on consumer trust, brand credibility, and purchase intention. Data from a quantitative survey of 402 respondents across age groups and product categories were analyzed with Pearson correlation, mediation analysis, moderation analysis (linear regression), exploratory factor analysis, and chi-square tests. The results point to a “transparency paradox” in influencer marketing: explicit influencer disclosure was weakly but significantly associated with lower trust, and exposure to AI-generated fake engagement had a moderate negative association with purchase intention. Perceived authenticity and consumer skepticism formed the strongest mediating construct and accounted for a large part of the link between transparency and trust. The study extends source credibility theory, dual-process cognition, and heuristic persuasion by showing that consumers recognize inauthenticity and still respond to volume-based social proof. Brands, content platforms, and regulators can draw on these results to design ethical and effective digital marketing ecosystems.
References
[1] Yuanyuan Wu, Eric W. T. Ngai, Pengkun Wu, and Chong Wu, "Fake online reviews: Literature review, synthesis, and directions for future research," Decis. Support Syst., vol. 132, Art. no. 113280, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113280.
[2] Joni Salminen, Chandrashekhar Kandpal, Ahmed Mohamed Kamel, Soon-gyo Jung, and Bernard J. Jansen, "Creating and detecting fake reviews of online products," J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 64, Art. no. 102771, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102771.
[3] Carl I. Hovland, Irving L. Janis, and Harold H. Kelley, Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale Univ. Press, 1953.
[4] Roobina Ohanian, "Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness," J. Advert., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 39-52, 1990, doi: 10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191.
[5] Christy M. K. Cheung and Dimple R. Thadani, "The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model," Decis. Support Syst., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 461-470, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008.
[6] Dina Mayzlin, Yaniv Dover, and Judith Chevalier, "Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation," Amer. Econ. Rev., vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 2421-2455, 2014, doi: 10.1257/aer.104.8.2421.
[7] Robert B. Cialdini, Influence: Science and Practice, 4th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001, ISBN 0-321-01147-3.
[8] Wasim Ahmad and Jin Sun, "Modeling consumer distrust of online hotel reviews," Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 71, pp. 77-90, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.12.005.
[9] Federal Trade Commission, "Disclosures 101 for social media influencers," FTC, Washington, DC, USA, Nov. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/disclosures-101-social-media-influencers
[10] Carolina Stubb, Anna-Greta Nyström, and Jonas Colliander, "Influencer marketing: The impact of disclosing sponsorship compensation justification on sponsored content effectiveness," J. Commun. Manag., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 109-122, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JCOM-11-2018-0119.
[11] Margaret C. Campbell and Amna Kirmani, "Consumers' use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent," J. Consum. Res., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 69-83, 2000, doi: 10.1086/314309.
[12] Sophie C. Boerman, Lotte M. Willemsen, and Eva P. Van Der Aa, "'This post is sponsored': Effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of Facebook," J. Interact. Mark., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 82-92, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002.
[13] Alice Audrezet, Gwarlann de Kerviler, and Julie Guidry Moulard, "Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation," J. Bus. Res., vol. 117, pp. 557-569, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008.
[14] Mike Schallehn, Christoph Burmann, and Nicola Riley, "Brand authenticity: Model development and empirical testing," J. Prod. Brand Manag., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 192-199, 2014, doi: 10.1108/JPBM-06-2013-0339.
[15] Carl Obermiller and Eric R. Spangenberg, "Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising," J. Consum. Psychol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 159-186, 1998, doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_03.
[16] Richard E. Petty and John T. Cacioppo, "The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion," in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 1986, pp. 123-205, doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2.
[17] Jum C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1978, ISBN 0-07-047465-6.
[18] Marian Friestad and Peter Wright, "The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts," J. Consum. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-31, 1994, doi: 10.1086/209380.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in Conference Proceedings in Science and Management are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant the journal first publication rights. Readers are free to share and adapt the published material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided appropriate credit is given to the author, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated.
